BF Data Type Bugs Model
Irena Bojanova, Inventor, Creator, PI & Lead, Bugs Framework (BF), 2014 – ~~~~ #

Data Type bugs could be introduced at any of the declaration, name resolution, data type conversion, or _data type related computation" phases. Each data type related bug or weakness involves one data type operation: Declare, Define, Refer, Call, Cast, Coerce, Calculate, or Evaluate.

The BF Data Type Bugs model (Figure 1) helped us identify the phases and the operations where such bugs could occur. The phases correspond to the BF Data Type Bugs classes: Declaration Bugs (DCL), Name Resolution (NRS), Type Conversion Bugs (TCV), and Type Computation Bugs (TCM). All data type operations are grouped by phase. The presented operations flow helps in identifying possible chains of bugs/weaknesses.

Figure 1. BF Data Type Bugs Model. Comprises phases, corresponding to the BF classes DCL, NRS, TCV, and TCM. Shows the data type operations flow: blue arrows – the main flow; purple arrows – flow when resolved data types get bound to objects, functions, or generic data types according to their declarations; blue arrows – flow when casting (explicit conversion) is expected before the call; green arrows – flow when the value will get coerced (implicitly converted) to the parameter data type or the return data type, correspondingly.

The operations under NRS are on resolving referred names and on binding their data types and the objects data, and on resolving called functions and binding their implementations: Refer and Call.The NRS operations are tied to the name resolution and binding that the Type System performs. Figure 2 shows the corresponding sub-model. Note that the object data value is bound via the Initialize and Write operations of the BF Memory Use Bugs (MUS) class.

Figure 2. Name Resolution and Biding.

The operations under TCM are on calculating (an arithmetic operation – part of an algebraic expression) and on evaluating (a boolean operation – part of a condition): Calculate and Evaluate.

The possible flow between operations from different phases is depicted with arrows in Figure 1. A declared and defined entity is referred in source code via its name. Names, referred to in remote scopes, get resolved via resolved names- paces; resolved data types get bound to objects, functions, or generic data types according to their declarations (see the purple arrow flow). A resolved and bound object may be converted to another data type and used in computations as an argument or as a return of a called function, or to call a member function. A passed in argument is expected to be of the declared parameter data type and the passed out result is expected to be of the return data type. Otherwise, casting (explicit conversion) is expected before the call (see the blue arrows flow) or the value will get coerced (implicitly converted) to the parameter data type or the return data type, correspondingly (see the green arrows flow). Note that the green arrows flow is about passed in/out objects – it starts only from NRS Call, it never starts from DCL Declare. The presented operations flow helps in identifying possible chains of bugs and weaknesses.